Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40900962›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The role of hope, academic thriving, and adaptive coping in fostering peace of mind among university students: a mixed-methods study.

Jing Shan, Teng Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jing ShanCollege of Education and Modern Media, Shandong Institute of Petroleum and Chemical Technology, Dongying, Shandong, China.
Teng XuLeague Committee, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: University students face significant academic stress, making psychological resources like hope, academic thriving, and adaptive coping essential for emotional well-being. Drawing on Snyder's Hope Theory and Schreiner's model of academic thriving, this study examines how these psychological constructs contribute to students' peace of mind. Methods: This mixed-methods study collected quantitative data from 562 undergraduate students in mainland China using validated measures of hope, academic thriving, adaptive coping, and peace of mind. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the quantitative data. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and reflective journals to provide additional context. Results: The quantitative analysis revealed that hope and academic thriving are both directly and indirectly associated with peace of mind, with adaptive coping playing a significant mediating role. Specifically, higher levels of hope and thriving predicted greater use of adaptive coping strategies, which, in turn, enhanced students' emotional tranquility and mental clarity. The qualitative data provided nuanced insights into how students' hope, thriving, and coping strategies shaped their experiences of peace of mind. Discussion: The findings suggest that promoting hope, fostering academic thriving, and teaching adaptive coping techniques can help students navigate academic challenges while maintaining emotional balance. These results have practical implications for educational interventions, highlighting the value of integrating psychological support into university settings to enhance both academic success and emotional well-being.

Indexed as

academic thrivingadaptive copingemotional well-beinghopemixed-methods studypeace of mindstructural equation modelinguniversity students

Identifiers

PMID40900962
PMCPMC12400332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.