Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40900947›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The devil effect triggered by sexual crimes.

Michaela Pfundmair, Romana Matanovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michaela PfundmairFaculty of Psychology, Alpen-Adria University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.
Romana MatanovicFaculty of Psychology, Alpen-Adria University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has identified a number of stereotypical beliefs about sexual crimes, particularly in relation to child sexual abuse and rape. We suggested that these beliefs may be the result of a negative halo effect (i.e., a single negative attribute biases subsequent impression formation judgments). We therefore hypothesized that mere keyword pairs containing 'sex' activate negative schemas that influence judgments of criminal cases. We conducted three studies to investigate this hypothesis. In a focus group interview, we attempted to gain a basic understanding of the hypothesized effect. Two online surveys were used to quantify the initial findings. The results showed that the keywords 'sex and children' triggered strong negative schemas such as acts of violence, pedophile offenders, and a desire for harsh punishments. The keywords 'sex and violence' activated impressions of a broader range of offenses, but still strongly negative associations about the possible offender and harsh penalties. In contrast, the combined keywords 'children and violence,' which served as a control, elicited more heterogeneous responses. Overall, the current findings confirm the idea of a devil effect triggered by sexual crimes. This effect could have serious consequences, from reduced awareness of actual crimes to biased judgments by judges and juries.

Indexed as

devil effecthalo effectjudgmentsschemassexual crimes

Identifiers

PMID40900947
PMCPMC12399528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.