ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
A combined model integrating deep learning, radiomics, and clinical ultrasound features for predicting
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop an integrated model that combines radiomics, deep learning features, and clinical and ultrasound characteristics for predicting Methods: This retrospective study included 717 thyroid nodules from 672 patients with PTC combined with HT from four hospitals in China. Deep learning and radiomics were employed to extract deep learning and radiomics features from ultrasound images. Feature selection was performed using Pearson's correlation coefficient, the Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) algorithm, and LASSO regression. The optimal algorithm was selected from nine machine learning algorithms for model construction, including the traditional radiomics model (RAD), the deep learning model (DL), and their fusion model (DL_RAD). Additionally, a final combined model was developed by integrating the DL_RAD model with clinical and ultrasound features. Model performance was assessed using AUC, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA), while SHAP analysis was used to interpret the contribution of each feature to the combined model's output. Results: The combined model achieved superior diagnostic performance, with AUC values of 0.895, 0.864, and 0.815 in the training, validation, and external test sets, respectively, outperforming the RAD model, DL model, and RAD_DL model. DeLong test results indicated significant differences in the external test set ( Conclusion: The combined model integrating radiomics, deep learning features, and clinical as well as ultrasound characteristics exhibits excellent diagnostic performance in predicting
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.