Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40900874›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of methodology2025

Machine learning for patient selection in corticosteroid decision making in knee osteoarthritis: A feasibility model.

Omar Musbahi, Kyriacos Pouris, Savvas Hadjixenophontos, Ahmed Al-Saadawi, Iris Soteriou, Justin Peter Cobb, Gareth G Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Omar MusbahiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer - Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom. om112@ic.ac.uk.
Kyriacos PourisFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom.
Savvas HadjixenophontosFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom.
Ahmed Al-SaadawiFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AD, United Kingdom.
Iris SoteriouFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom.
Justin Peter CobbDepartment of Surgery and Cancer - Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom.
Gareth G JonesDepartment of Surgery and Cancer - Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelieving pain is central to the early management of knee osteoarthritis, with a plethora of pharmacological agents licensed for this purpose. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are a widely used option, albeit with variable efficacy.

aimTo develop a machine learning (ML) model that predicts which patients will benefit from corticosteroid injections.

methodsData from two prospective cohort studies [Osteoarthritis (OA) Initiative and Multicentre OA Study] was combined. The primary outcome was patient-reported pain score following corticosteroid injection, assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA pain scale, with significant change defined using minimally clinically important difference and meaningful within person change. A ML algorithm was developed, utilizing linear discriminant analysis, to predict symptomatic improvement, and examine the association between pain scores and patient factors by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and F2 score.

resultsA total of 330 patients were included, with a mean age of 63.4 (SD: 8.3). The mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA pain score was 5.2 (SD: 4.1), with only 25.5% of patients achieving significant improvement in pain following corticosteroid injection. The ML model generated an accuracy of 67.8% (95% confidence interval: 64.6%-70.9%), F1 score of 30.8%, and an area under the curve score of 0.60.

conclusionThe model demonstrated feasibility to assist clinicians with decision-making in patient selection for corticosteroid injections. Further studies are required to improve the model prior to testing in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Corticosteroid injectionKnee osteoarthritisMachine learningPatient selectionPredictive modelling

Identifiers

PMID40900874
PMCPMC12400338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.