ReviewWorld journal of methodology2025
Uncovering the role of microbiota and fecal microbiota transplantation in Crohn's disease: Current advances and future hurdles.
Review in World journal of methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crohn's disease (CD) is an idiopathic, chronic, and recurrent inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract. Recent studies suggest a potential role of gut microbiota in CD, particularly dysbiosis-an imbalance in gut bacteria. While dysbiosis is consistently observed in CD, it remains uncertain whether it is a cause or a consequence of the disease. Given its association with CD, the therapeutic potential of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been explored. This review examines the role of gut microbiota in CD, evaluates the therapeutic potential of probiotics and FMT, and highlights current research findings and limitations. Key studies on the relationship between gut dysbiosis, probiotics, and FMT in CD were analyzed, with a focus on randomized trials, meta-analyses, and clinical observations. Dysbiosis is a consistent feature of CD, but its causative role remains unclear. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics have shown no efficacy in inducing or maintaining remission in CD. FMT shows potential as a therapeutic option for CD, but its efficacy remains inconsistent and inconclusive. The variability in outcomes, including diminished effects over time despite repeated FMT, underscores the need for larger, well-controlled trials. Only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) has compared FMT with sham transplantation, but the sample size was very small. Other studies are limited by factors such as small sample sizes, lack of control groups, short follow-up periods, and inconsistent methodologies, making it challenging to draw definitive conclusions. While gut dysbiosis likely plays a role in CD pathogenesis, its causative role remains uncertain. Current evidence does not support FMT as a reliable treatment for inducing or maintaining remission in CD, though it appears generally safe. Larger, standardized, RCTs are necessary to clarify the therapeutic role of FMT in CD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.