ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Exploring the barriers and facilitators to safer hair product purchasing and use among Black women in the greater Boston area through photovoice in the RESTYLE study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Racial/ethnic differences in personal care product (PCP) use, including hair products, are well-documented in the United States (US). Black women are more highly exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals in PCPs compared to other racial/ethnic groups. We identified barriers and facilitators to safer hair product purchasing and use in the greater Boston, Massachusetts area. Methods: Twenty-one Black women were recruited through community organizations to participate in photovoice as a part of the Retail Environment and Hair Styling Exposure (RESTYLE) study. Participants as co-researchers were trained in photography/PCP safety preceding a focus group. The co-researchers took photographs based on a prompt and then engaged in an interview and a focus group to discuss the photos. The co-researchers participated in another round of photography, interviews, and focus groups based on a second co-developed prompt. All study activities were virtual. Deductive and inductive approaches were used to code and analyze the data using NVIVO Version R1. Results: Five themes related to barriers were identified (e.g., unsafe ingredients allowed in US products and differences in access to safer hair products). Two concepts underlying the barriers were distrust in government/large corporations and individual burden/responsibility to shop for safer products. The two themes related to facilitators were going back to our cultural and community roots and raising individual knowledge and public awareness for action. Discussion: Photovoice is a powerful community-based participatory method rooted in community experiences. Several barriers and facilitators to safer hair product purchasing and use were identified among the co-researchers' lived experiences that can inform future research and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.