ArticleSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2025
Percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed unprecedented strain on healthcare systems, particularly on critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV). Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) has emerged as a potential strategy to facilitate weaning, reduce intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and optimize resource use. However, the timing, safety, and outcomes of PT in COVID-19 patients remain debatable.
objectivesThis study aimed to describe the technical aspects of the procedure and evaluate the early safety of our technique to healthcare professionals, as well as the short-term factors affecting survival in 103 consecutive patients after tracheostomy.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with COVID-19 who underwent PT between March 2020 and June 2020 at Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo. The factors considered for analysis included age, sex, timing of tracheostomy, proportion of affected lungs, comorbidities, fraction of inspired oxygen on MV, and availability of professional private equipment. Univariate analysis was performed for screening, and variables with P < 0.20 were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model.
resultsMost patients were male, with a median age of 68 years. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (n = 55/52%), diabetes (n = 37/36%), and heart disease (n = 24/21%). Patients over 60 years old had reduced survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.35; P = 0.003), and those who underwent high nasal flow catheter (HR = 0.49; P = 0.02) and PT earlier (< 10 days) had better survival (HR = 0.37; P = 0.04).
conclusionEarly PT in selected patients may reduce the duration of MV and lead to shorter ICU stays. The health system is overloaded by the scarcity of ventilators and beds for critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.