ArticleZoo biology
Pilot Investigation: Testing Opaque Water as an Agonism Mitigating Visual Barrier for Nile Crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus).
Article in Zoo biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This pilot investigation sought to evaluate the effectiveness of water opacity as an agonism-mitigation strategy in an all-male group of Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus). Crocodile behavior was monitored over 95 observation hours, split approximately equally between transparent water and opaque water conditions. In addition to agonism rates, the crocodiles' use of water was evaluated to ensure the change in their habitat did not disrupt utilization of the water, which is an important component of their thermoregulatory processes. Agonism rates were approximately equal between the transparent and opaque water conditions. The proportion of the group in water was lower in the opaque condition though the mean difference between conditions suggests that approximately two more crocodiles (out of a group size that ranged from 21 to 18 individuals) were in water in the transparent condition than opaque condition. Overall, these findings suggest the opaque water had little to no effect on the crocodiles' behavior as measured here. However, the opaque water may have increased environmental complexity. In nature, crocodiles navigate opaque water utilizing chemosensory and integumentary sensory modalities that are likely underutilized in transparent water commonly provided to crocodilians living in human care. Further research is needed to understand how opaque water may be enriching for crocodilians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.