ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Familiarity enhances the effectiveness of odors as cues in paired-associate memory.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous olfactory paired-associate (PA) studies showed that odors are less effective associative cues than other sensory modalities. It has been suggested that odor familiarity might improve memory stability, thereby facilitating PA memory performance. In the current study, we designed three experiments to investigate whether enhanced odor familiarity would also enhance the effectiveness of odors in a PA memory paradigm. In Experiments 1 and 2, subjects associated target shapes with eight familiar and eight unfamiliar odors (based on normative odor ratings in Experiment 1 and individual ratings in Experiment 2). The results of both experiments indicated that familiar odor cues were more effective in the retrieval of targets than unfamiliar odor cues. In Experiment 3, we investigated whether becoming (more) familiar with odors would also enhance the effectiveness of odors as cues in an olfactory PA test. An experimental group was familiarized with half of the pre-rated odors (16 odors, eight high and eight low familiar) over 4 weeks prior to the laboratory procedure while a control group was not. Both groups engaged in a PA memory paradigm in which they associated 32 odors (16 high and 16 low familiar odors) with black and white complex shapes. The results indicated that odor training led to enhanced PA learning for low-familiar odors in relation to untrained low-familiar odors. These results provide further evidence for odor familiarity as one of the critical features in olfactory processing and memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.