Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40900405›Full record

ReviewApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2025

Nanoflowers: Smart Molecules for Biofilm Management.

Tahayya Haq, Samriddhi Jaswani, Roohi Roohi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tahayya HaqDepartment of Bioengineering, Integral University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Samriddhi JaswaniDepartment of Bioengineering, Integral University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Roohi RoohiDepartment of Bioengineering, Integral University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. roohi0607@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4296-6105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm formation poses challenges across various sectors, such as healthcare facilities, food safety, and in industrial processes, owing to the resilience of microbial communities encased in protective extracellular matrices. This paper delves into the strategies for biofilm control, highlighting recent/novel chemical, biological, and nanotechnological approaches. Chemical methods exploit the potential of natural compounds, such as phenolic antioxidants and nanoparticles, to disrupt biofilms, thereby boosting the effectiveness of antimicrobial treatments. In parallel, biological strategies involve the use of predatory bacteria and biosurfactants and offer eco-friendly alternatives. In nanotechnology, particularly the nanoflowers, due to their unique morphology and high surface area, show greater promise in efficiently targeting biofilms by enabling enhanced bacterial interaction and precise drug delivery. The implications of these approaches are far-reaching, extending to the food industry, where biofilm formation can result in spoilage and foodborne illnesses, as well as in biomedical applications aimed at preventing infections related to medical devices. This paper underscores the potential of integrating these approaches to develop more effective and sustainable solutions for biofilm management, contributing to enhanced health and safety across multiple domains.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsNanoparticlesNanotechnologyBacteriaHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-microbial resistanceBiofilm inhibitionBiofilmsNanoflowers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.