SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Efficacy and safety of superior laryngeal nerve block in neurogenic cough: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block on tracheal tube-related responses during postoperative recovery in craniotomy patients: a randomized controlled trial.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Comparison of alfentanil and sufentanil on extubation-related cough following suspension laryngoscopy surgery: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeurogenic cough is a chronic condition characterized by persistent coughing that is unresponsive to conventional treatments. It is thought to result from sensory neuropathy of the laryngeal nerves, leading to heightened cough reflex sensitivity. Current management strategies include neuromodulating medications and speech therapy, but these are often ineffective or associated with significant side effects. Superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) block has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, hypothesized to modulate sensory feedback and disrupt maladaptive cough signaling pathways. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of SLN block in the treatment of neurogenic cough.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to January 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating SLN block for neurogenic cough. Outcomes analyzed included the Cough Severity Index (CSI), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) scores, improvement rates, and incidence of serious adverse events. Data synthesis was performed using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.
resultsNine studies (eight retrospective and one RCT) with sample sizes ranging from 16 to 209 patients were included. SLN block resulted in a significant reduction in CSI scores (MD = -11.2, 95% CI: -15.32, -7.08) and a significant improvement in LCQ scores (MD = 2.23, 95% CI: 0.6, 3.85, p = 0.007). The intervention showed a high incidence of symptom improvement (effect estimate = 0.803, 95% CI: 0.722, 0.883) with a low rate of serious adverse events (effect estimate = 0.015, 95% CI: 0.0001, 0.03).
conclusionSLN block is a promising and safe intervention for neurogenic cough, demonstrating significant symptom relief and minimal adverse effects. However, further RCTs are needed to confirm long-term efficacy and establish standardized treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40900321What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.