ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Polyaxial angle stability].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyaxial screw systems are the state of the art in the field of fracture fixation. In contrast to conventional monoaxial systems, the polyaxial constructs enable variable screw angulation, enhancing the adaptability of plate-screw configurations in different surgical scenarios and different anatomical circumstances. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the functional principles, clinical applications and inherent limitations of polyaxial stability. The conventional monaxial technology restricts screw positioning, potentially compromising fixation in some fracture situations or anatomical regions. In contrast, polyaxial systems enable adapted screw placement, addressing specific requirements arising during surgery. Various locking mechanisms based on friction, deformation, thread forms and engagement techniques, play crucial roles in achieving stability. The article discusses the key currently used technologies, their mechanical characteristics and comparative behavior as the biomechanical interaction between screws and plates is crucial for achieving maximum stability and preventing failure modes that could compromise fracture healing. This article emphasizes that while polyaxial systems offer enhanced fragment-specific screw positioning, their successful application relies on careful surgical technique and an understanding of the mechanics involved. By integrating insights from clinical experiences, biomechanics, and the literature, we aim to raise awareness and support decision-making in fracture management using polyaxial systems. Ultimately, the article advocates a balanced understanding of both the benefits and challenges associated with polyaxial fracture fixation in modern orthopedic trauma surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40900319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.