Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40900296›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025

Probing mental representations of space through sketch mapping: a scoping review.

M Simonet, C Vater, C Abati, S Zhong, P Mavros, A Schwering, M Raubal, C Hölscher, J Krukar

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M SimonetChair of Cognitive Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. marie.simonet@gess.ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-9055-7264
C VaterInstitute of Sport Science, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
C AbatiChair of Cognitive Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
S ZhongInstitute of Cartography and Geoinformation, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
P Mavrosi3 (UMR 9217), CNRS, Télécom Paris, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3027-3072
A SchweringInstitute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
M RaubalInstitute of Cartography and Geoinformation, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
C HölscherChair of Cognitive Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5536-6582
J KrukarInstitute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung grant number 202284 - 3D Sketch Maps.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive maps are mental representations of space essential for guiding spatial behavior. To assess the properties of these cognitive maps, sketch mapping has been widely used as a research tool in spatial cognition research. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the methodologies and the cognitive processes concerning the externalization of cognitive maps through sketch mapping. Following the PRISMA-ScR checklist (Tricco et al. in Ann Intern Med 169(7):467-473, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 ), a comprehensive search from five electronic databases was performed with predefined combinations of keywords. Twenty-four articles were selected and analyzed, covering a wide range of methods: traditional pen-and-paper sketching (n = 18 studies); combination of pen-and-paper and digital sketching (n = 1); exclusively digital sketching (n = 4); and digital VR sketching (n = 1). With regard to the formation of cognitive maps in environmental scale spaces, studies employed either direct experience or virtual experience of unfamiliar environments, videos, maps, or retrieval from own memory. This review highlights the inherent conflict between sketch maps' advantages in capturing knowledge in less structured experimental protocols and researchers' need for structured quantification of their quality, as well as the underused diversity of media through which sketch maps can be produced for appropriate scenarios. We encourage researchers to (a) increase the precision in reporting the cognitive processes being investigated with sketch maps (e.g., short-term vs. long-term memory), (b) rely on established data analysis methods instead of developing custom measures for each study, and (c) consider alternative media beyond pen and paper when more suitable to the experimental context.

Indexed as

Space PerceptionHumansMental representation of spaceScoping reviewSketch mapSpatial cognition

Identifiers

PMID40900296
PMCPMC12408434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.