ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025
Establishment of National Diagnostic Reference Levels 2025 for nuclear medicine in Japan.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Error analysis of cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism in three-dimensionalAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Contemporary strategies for dose optimization in pediatric congenital heart disease CT: size-specific acquisition and detector-level advances.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Review
- Comparison of DLP and CTDI in somatom Definition Flash and GE revolution computed tomography scanners at AIIMS, India.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are practical benchmarks for optimizing patient radiation exposure in medical imaging. In Japan, national DRLs, including those for nuclear medicine together and other radiological procedures, were first established in 2015 and revised in 2020. In this study, we revised the DRL values of nuclear medicine for the establishment of DRLs2025, based on data collected from institutions nationwide throughout Japan. Data were collected via an online survey from facilities performing nuclear medicine procedures, including SPECT, PET, and hybrid CT imaging. Information on dose activity of the administered radiopharmaceuticals and CT parameters (CTDIvol and DLP) were collected. DRL values were determined through analysis of the submitted data, supplemented by panel discussions among experts taking into account the clinical appropriateness of the values and various technological factors. Overall, the newly established DRLs2025 demonstrated a decreasing trend in administered radiopharmaceutical activities, CTDIvol, and DLP compared with the previous surveys. This trend reflects ongoing efforts toward the optimization of radiation exposure and radiopharmaceutical dose reduction, likely driven by the introduction of image reconstruction methods based on newer technologies. However, substantial interfacility variations were observed, particularly in the CT parameters, suggesting disparities in equipment, imaging protocols, and the balance between image quality and radiation dose. The establishment of DRLs2025 underscores continued progress in optimizing radiation exposure in nuclear medicine practice in Japan. Although issues regarding data variability and quality remain, DRLs continue to be a key tool in radiation protection and quality assurance. Ongoing efforts to improve data collection systems and to align procedures with international standards are essential for the future refinement of DRLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.