ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2026
Language Concordance and Interpreter Use in Primary Care: Perspectives from Spanish-preferring Patients.
Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Communication Barriers in Patient-Provider Interactions in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Multivariable regression modelling of structural, intermediary and demographic determinants of health literacy: evidence from unaccompanied migrants and statelessness-prone individuals in Ghana.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Language Access in Healthcare: Aligning Policy and Evidence to Improve Patient Experience Through Professional Interpretation and Language- Concordant Care.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare provided by bilingual providers or with assistance from qualified interpreters is intended to improve patient-provider communication. Despite federal laws requiring healthcare facilities to provide access to appropriate interpretation language assistance services for patients not proficient in English, many Spanish-preferring patients receive primary care from providers not fluent in Spanish or who regularly use formal interpreters. Partnering with two urban SafetyNet providers in Southern California, we conducted focus groups in Spanish with Spanish-preferring patients who received care from providers who: (1) were Spanish-qualified, (2) used formal interpreters, and (3) used informal interpreters or other communication strategies. We coded transcripts to identify themes and compared patient experiences across provider types. Our study included 62 adult Spanish-preferring primary care patients. Spanish-preferring patients reported preference for continuity with their English-speaking providers despite language barriers because of established rapport. Patients receiving care from Spanish-language-qualified providers reported greater trust, more comprehensive care (i.e., covered more issues with minimal detail), yet with many interactions rushed. Formal interpreters facilitated better understanding and professional communication, however, impersonalized some patient-provider interactions. Informal interpreters or ad-hoc strategies led to mixed experiences, often dependent on patient or provider ability to accurately convey medical information. Overall, Spanish-preferring patient experiences highlighted the necessity for healthcare systems to support robust language and interpretation services that enhance direct communication, ensure interpreter quality, and maintain long-term patient-provider relationships. Improvements in policy and practice are needed to optimize healthcare communication for Spanish-preferring patients, since patient-provider communication is critical for high-quality health outcomes and experiences in multilingual settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.