ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Revision analysis and successful solutions for my failed primary total knee arthroplasties].
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of patients following primary total knee arthroplasty requiring revision surgery is one of the most demanding tasks in orthopedic surgery. A careful failure analysis and a systematic approach are of great importance for the often very individual situations. In addition to excellent technical skills, preoperative planning is of great importance. QUESTION: This paper describes the preoperative assessment and planning, as well as the technical strategy for the revision of primary knee arthroplasties. MATERIAL AND
methodsBeside a review of the existing literature, the article introduces the senior author's revision strategies based on 20 years of experience in total joint replacement.
resultsAdequate preoperative imaging, laboratory tests and, if necessary, joint aspiration are essential for the individual diagnostics and planning of the revision procedure. The article focuses on the prophylaxis and treatment options for acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infections, aseptic implant loosening, arthrofibrosis and joint instability. DISCUSSION: It is often a challenge for the surgeon to face his/her own patient requiring a revision surgery, and the patient expects the same result for these technical, often much more demanding operations as for the primary surgery. This inherent conflict results in considerable challenges for the arthroplasty surgeon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40900237What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.