Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40900216›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025

Quantifying the local strain energy density distribution in the mouse tibia: the critical role of the loading direction.

Saira Mary Farage-O'Reilly, Vee San Cheong, Peter Pivonka, Visakan Kadirkamanathan, Enrico Dall'Ara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saira Mary Farage-O'ReillyInsigneo Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Vee San CheongInsigneo Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Peter PivonkaSchool of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Visakan KadirkamanathanInsigneo Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Enrico Dall'AraInsigneo Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. e.dallara@sheffield.ac.uk.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/K03877X/1 and EP/S032940/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council X/013991-12National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/R001073/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how bone adapts to external forces is fundamental for exploring potential biomechanical interventions against skeletal diseases. This can be studied preclinically, combining in vivo experiments in rodents and in silico mechanoregulation models. While the in vivo tibial loading model is widely used to study bone adaptation, the common assumption of purely axial loading may be a simplification. This study quantifies the effect of the loading direction on the strain energy density (SED) distribution in the mouse tibia, a commonly used input for mechanoregulated bone remodelling models. To achieve this, validated micro-finite element (micro-FE) models were used to test the differences in local SED when the bone was loaded along different loading directions. In vivo micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images were acquired from the tibiae of eleven ovariectomised mice at 18 weeks old before intervention and at 20 weeks old, after six mice underwent external mechanical loading. Micro-CT-based micro-FE models were generated for each tibia at both time points and loaded with a unit load in each Cartesian direction independently. The results from these unit load models were linearly combined to simulate various loading directions, defined by angles θ (inferior-superior) and ϕ (anterior-posterior). The results revealed a high sensitivity of the mouse tibia to the loading direction across both groups and time points. Several loading directions (e.g., θ = 10°, ϕ = 205-210°) resulted in lower medians of the top 5% SED values compared to those obtained for the nominal axial case (θ = 0°, ϕ = 0°). Conversely, higher values were observed for other directions (e.g., θ = 30°, ϕ = 35-50°). These findings emphasise the importance of considering the loading direction in experimental and computational bone adaptation studies.

Indexed as

Stress, MechanicalTibiaAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFinite Element AnalysisMiceMice, Inbred C57BLWeight-BearingX-Ray MicrotomographyLoading directionMechanical loadingMicro-CTMicro-FEMouse tibiaStrain distribution

Identifiers

PMID40900216
PMCPMC12618303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.