ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
Quantifying the local strain energy density distribution in the mouse tibia: the critical role of the loading direction.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-scale modelling of mouse tibia loading reveals the critical role of muscle insertion surfaces.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how bone adapts to external forces is fundamental for exploring potential biomechanical interventions against skeletal diseases. This can be studied preclinically, combining in vivo experiments in rodents and in silico mechanoregulation models. While the in vivo tibial loading model is widely used to study bone adaptation, the common assumption of purely axial loading may be a simplification. This study quantifies the effect of the loading direction on the strain energy density (SED) distribution in the mouse tibia, a commonly used input for mechanoregulated bone remodelling models. To achieve this, validated micro-finite element (micro-FE) models were used to test the differences in local SED when the bone was loaded along different loading directions. In vivo micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images were acquired from the tibiae of eleven ovariectomised mice at 18 weeks old before intervention and at 20 weeks old, after six mice underwent external mechanical loading. Micro-CT-based micro-FE models were generated for each tibia at both time points and loaded with a unit load in each Cartesian direction independently. The results from these unit load models were linearly combined to simulate various loading directions, defined by angles θ (inferior-superior) and ϕ (anterior-posterior). The results revealed a high sensitivity of the mouse tibia to the loading direction across both groups and time points. Several loading directions (e.g., θ = 10°, ϕ = 205-210°) resulted in lower medians of the top 5% SED values compared to those obtained for the nominal axial case (θ = 0°, ϕ = 0°). Conversely, higher values were observed for other directions (e.g., θ = 30°, ϕ = 35-50°). These findings emphasise the importance of considering the loading direction in experimental and computational bone adaptation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.