Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Maximal inspiratory pressure in sedentary and active breast cancer survivors: an observational study.
Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGiven the effects of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on exercise tolerance of Breast Cancer survivor (BCS) and since IMT load is adjusted based on Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP), the aim of this study was to evaluate MIP of BCS, compare it with the obtained from predictive equations for healthy women, and study the possible effects of physical activity level on it.
methodsMIP was obtained from 50 BSC and compared with the theoretical values of MIP estimated through predictive equations of Black & Hyatt, and Hautmann. BCS were categorized in 25 active and 25 sedentary according to HUNT1-PAQ questionnaire.
resultsMeasured MIP (65.5 ± 23.9 cm H
conclusionThe results of this study clearly show than MIP is lower than the predicted by equations in BCS and suggests the importance of measuring it, not only for adjust the load of future IMT interventions, but also to evaluate the effects of exercise programs on it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40900201What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.