ArticleDaru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2025
In vitro evaluation of CeO
Article in Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protective effects of ginseng against reproductive injury: mechanisms and research progress.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDoxorubicin (Dox) is a chemotherapy medication used in the therapy of cancers. However, despite its killing of cancer cells, Dox is toxic to the heart and can lead to heart failure. This outcome in turn poses a therapeutic challenge given the limited treatment options available to these individuals.
objectivesThis study examines how CeO₂ nanoparticles, through oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and mitochondrial function, reduced Dox toxicity in human cardiac myocyte (HCM) cells.
methodsFollowing detection of the optimal doses of CeO₂ nanoparticles using the MTT assay, HCM cells were treated with Dox (8.25 µM) and CeO₂ nanoparticles for 24 h. Then, the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), malondialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione (GSH) and the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) were determined. Furthermore, the mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial swelling, and mitochondrial cytochrome c release were analyzed. The level of gene expression of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, as well as apoptosis, was also examined.
resultsThe data of this work demonstrated that Dox significantly elevated levels of ROS and MDA and reduced GSH level and SOD activity, which is modified by CeO₂ nanoparticles. Also, Dox meaningfully increased inflammation markers and apoptosis and induced mitochondrial malfunction, which were meaningfully reduced by CeO₂ nanoparticles in a dose-response manner in HCM cells.
conclusionAccording to the present study results, CeO₂ nanoparticles, through a reduction in oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and mitochondrial malfunction, can have therapeutic potential in HCM cells toxicity induced by Dox.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.