Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40900115›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Beyond rigid docking: deep learning approaches for fully flexible protein-ligand interactions.

John Lee, Canh Hao Nguyen, Hiroshi Mamitsuka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Therapeutic peptides and proteins: Status and developments in drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John LeeBioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji 611-0011, Japan.
Canh Hao NguyenBioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji 611-0011, Japan.
Hiroshi MamitsukaBioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji 611-0011, Japan.

Funding

KAKENHI 22K12150MEXT KAKENHI 21H05027, 22H03645, 25H01144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sparked by AlphaFold2's groundbreaking success in protein structure prediction, recent years have seen a surge of interest in developing deep learning (DL) models for molecular docking. Molecular docking is a computational approach for predicting how proteins interact with small molecules known as ligands. It has become an essential tool in drug discovery, enabling structure-based virtual screening (VS) methods to efficiently explore vast libraries of drug-like molecules and identify potential therapeutic candidates. However, traditional docking methods primarily rely on search-and-score algorithms, which are computationally demanding. To be viable for VS applications, these methods often sacrifice accuracy for speed by simplifying their search algorithms and scoring functions. Recent advancements in DL have transformed molecular docking, offering accuracy that rivals-or even surpasses-traditional approaches while significantly reducing computational costs. Despite these advancements, DL-based molecular docking still faces major challenges. DL models often struggle to generalize beyond their training data and frequently mispredict key molecular properties, such as stereochemistry, bond lengths, and steric interactions, leading to physically unrealistic predictions. To overcome these limitations, a new generation of models is using DL to incorporate protein flexibility into docking predictions, aiming to more accurately capture the dynamic nature of biomolecular interactions-a long-standing challenge for traditional methods. This review explores how DL has reshaped molecular docking, examines its current shortcomings, and highlights emerging solutions. Finally, we discuss future opportunities to further bridge the gap between computational predictions and real-world molecular interactions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMolecular Docking SimulationProteinsAlgorithmsDrug DiscoveryHumansLigandsProtein BindingLigandsProteinsco-foldingdiffusion modelsflexible dockingmolecular dockingprotein–ligand interaction

Identifiers

PMID40900115
PMCPMC12406700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.