ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Phage quest: a beginner's guide to explore viral diversity in the prokaryotic world.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phage bioinformatics tools: a review of computational approaches for bacteriophage research.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Bacteriophage Science: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Applications, Challenges, and Translational Opportunities.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing interest in finding new viruses within (meta)genomic datasets has fueled the development of computational tools for virus detection and characterization from environmental samples. One key driver is phage therapy, the treatment of drug-resistant bacteria with tailored bacteriophage cocktails. Yet, keeping up with the growing number of automated virus detection and analysis tools has become increasingly difficult. Both phage biologists with limited bioinformatics expertise and bioinformaticians with little background in virus biology will benefit from this guide. It focuses on navigating routine tasks and tools related to (pro)phage detection, gene annotation, taxonomic classification, and other downstream analyses. We give a brief historical overview of how detection methods evolved, starting with early sequence-composition assessments to today's powerful machine-learning and deep learning techniques, including emerging language models capable of mining large, fragmented, and compositionally diverse metagenomic datasets. We also discuss tools specifically aimed at detecting filamentous phages (Inoviridae), a challenge for most phage predictors. Rather than providing an exhaustive list, we emphasize actively maintained and state-of-the-art tools that are accessible via web or command-line interfaces. This guide provides basic concepts and useful details about automated phage analysis for researchers in different biological and medical disciplines, helping them choose and apply appropriate tools for their quest to explore the genetic diversity and biology of the smallest and most abundant replicators on Earth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.