Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40900113›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Phage quest: a beginner's guide to explore viral diversity in the prokaryotic world.

Carolin Charlotte Wendling, Marie Vasse, Sébastien Wielgoss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carolin Charlotte WendlingDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Marie VasseDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Sébastien WielgossDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0127-3380

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation PZ00P3_179743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing interest in finding new viruses within (meta)genomic datasets has fueled the development of computational tools for virus detection and characterization from environmental samples. One key driver is phage therapy, the treatment of drug-resistant bacteria with tailored bacteriophage cocktails. Yet, keeping up with the growing number of automated virus detection and analysis tools has become increasingly difficult. Both phage biologists with limited bioinformatics expertise and bioinformaticians with little background in virus biology will benefit from this guide. It focuses on navigating routine tasks and tools related to (pro)phage detection, gene annotation, taxonomic classification, and other downstream analyses. We give a brief historical overview of how detection methods evolved, starting with early sequence-composition assessments to today's powerful machine-learning and deep learning techniques, including emerging language models capable of mining large, fragmented, and compositionally diverse metagenomic datasets. We also discuss tools specifically aimed at detecting filamentous phages (Inoviridae), a challenge for most phage predictors. Rather than providing an exhaustive list, we emphasize actively maintained and state-of-the-art tools that are accessible via web or command-line interfaces. This guide provides basic concepts and useful details about automated phage analysis for researchers in different biological and medical disciplines, helping them choose and apply appropriate tools for their quest to explore the genetic diversity and biology of the smallest and most abundant replicators on Earth.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteriophagesComputational BiologyProkaryotic CellsGenome, ViralMachine LearningMetagenomicsbacteriophagesgene annotationmetagenomicsmicrobial bioinformaticsphage predictionprophages

Identifiers

PMID40900113
PMCPMC12406692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.