ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
The Prevalence of Myopia in Finnish Conscripts Has not Increased in Recent Decades and Is Lower Than in Many East and Southeast Asian Countries.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Annual Solar Cycles: Investigating Seasonal Variations in Southern Norway and Their Potential Role in Human Eye Growth.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Myopia Trends in Europe: A Reappraisal of Current Evidence.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- [A population-based survey of myopia on primary school students in an administrative district, 2019 to 2024].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026Article
- Prevalence, vector evolution, and visual impact of astigmatism: a large-scale study of 79,066 children in Beijing, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Factors associated with the high prevalence of myopia and its decrease-A historical review.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of myopia among Finnish conscripts and to identify the factors associated with its occurrence in Finland. Methods: A total of 1694 conscripts (mean age: 19.3 ± 1.55 years) participated in the study. Refraction was performed on 1522 participants under tropicamide-induced cycloplegia. The final analyses included 1286 male conscripts who had completed the Finnish schooling system. A structured questionnaire collected data about education, time spent doing near work, smartphone use, and outdoor time. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the factors associated with myopia. Results: The overall prevalence of myopia was 23.5%, of which 0.4% had high myopia (SE ≤ -6 D). The main factors associated with myopia included (adjusted odds ratio; 95% confidence interval) near work time (1.184; 1.113-1.259), time spent outdoors (0.823; 0.754-0.895), and basic schooling versus higher education (1.256; 0.796-1.988). Among the higher-educated group, increased smartphone use was associated with a higher prevalence of myopia, whereas in the other educational groups, no association could be established. Conclusions: The prevalence of myopia among Finnish conscripts was relatively low, and high myopia was rare compared to the rates reported in many East and Southeast Asian countries. Higher education, prolonged near work, reduced time outdoors, and increased smartphone use (in the higher-educated group) were factors associated with myopia prevalence. The reduced educational pressure may be attributed to the lower prevalence of myopia among Finnish conscripts compared to many East and Southeast Asian countries, where myopia is much more prevalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.