ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025
Prediction of oocyte maturity before denudation: Is the assessment of COC morphology a reliable option?
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inverted microscopy as a high performance tool for pre denudation evaluation of oocyte nuclear maturity.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to demonstrate the predictive value of morphological assessment of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) prior to denudation in distinguishing mature and immature oocytes. Materials and Methods: The study consisted of two stages. Five embriologists were enrolled to the first stage of the study and they divided COCs into two groups according to the morphologic features of the COS's: COCs with mature oocytes and COCs with immature oocytes. The process was overseen by one embryologist. Two hours later, COCs were denuded, and the maturity of oocytes was evaluated by another embryologist. The results were recorded. The first stage was terminated when each embryologist had evaluated a minimum of 100 COCs. In the second stage, three embryologists applied the procedure continuously for one more month. At the end of the study, the effects of continuous assessment on the prediction success were evaluated. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled in the study, and a total of 1039 COCs were examined. In the first stage of the study, 69% of immature and 80% of mature oocytes were identified correctly by the embryologists. There was no significant difference among the embryologists in terms of success rates. In the second stage of the study, the success rates of immature oocyte prediction increased for all three embryologists. However, a statistically significant increase was observed for only one embryologist (p<0.05). However, the prediction rates of mature oocytes were comparable with the results of the first stage of the study. There was no significant relationship between the number of COCs and the prediction value. Conclusion: Morphological assessment of COCs before denudation does not provide accurate results in identifying mature and immature oocytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.