ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Deep learning-driven multi-hierarchical granularity integration for surgical scene understanding: experimental study.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor: Deep learning-driven multi-hierarchical granularity integration for surgical scene understanding: experimental study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA comprehensive understanding of surgical scenes by computers is a crucial foundation for achieving intelligent surgical assistance and autonomous decision-making. Surgical scene information encompasses coarse-grained data reflecting the overall process and fine-grained details showcasing specific operations. This study aims to construct a standardized, full-grained annotation dataset for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and develop a deep learning framework for multi-hierarchical granularity integration, providing support for clinical intelligent applications. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe collected 41 multi-center videos and performed comprehensive annotations, including 8 surgical phases, 17 surgical steps, 6 types of instrument segmentation, and 35 surgical action triplets (SATs). Using this dataset, we designed a lightweight framework that enables simultaneous perception of multi-granularity information through shared feature extraction and task-specific decoders. Based on the comprehensive understanding information, we developed a robust intraoperative bleeding prediction model using 123 combinations of machine learning algorithms and generated an automated postoperative surgical summary report.
resultsThe dataset of this study comprises 141 443 frames with annotations for surgical phases and steps, 8435 frames with instrument segmentation annotations, and 25 305 frames with SATs. Our deep learning framework achieves outstanding performance across tasks of different granularities, with recognition accuracy even surpassing that of six state-of-the-art algorithms developed separately for individual subtasks. Based on full-granularity features, we found that surgical steps involving key anatomical structures such as the renal artery, renal vein, and ureter are critical predictors of bleeding risk. And the post-operative automated reporting system accurately extracts key surgical time points and specific procedural durations.
conclusionWe constructed the first fully annotated dataset for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, and developed a novel framework that achieves bidirectional compensation and enhancement of both coarse and fine-granularity information. This study not only expands the theoretical boundaries of artificial intelligence in surgical procedures, but also lays a solid foundation for advancing intelligent surgery through the "data-algorithm-application" cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.