Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40899780›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2026

Parameter Estimation from Phylogenetic Trees Using Neural Networks and Ensemble Learning.

Tianjian Qin, Koen J van Benthem, Luis Valente, Rampal S Etienne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianjian QinGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, Groningen, 9747 AG, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2540-1778
Koen J van BenthemGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, Groningen, 9747 AG, The Netherlands.
Luis ValenteGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, Groningen, 9747 AG, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4247-8785
Rampal S EtienneGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, Groningen, 9747 AG, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2142-7612

Funding

China Scholarship CouncilUniversity of Groningen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species diversification is characterized by speciation and extinction, the rates of which can, under some assumptions, be estimated from time-calibrated phylogenies. However, maximum likelihood estimation methods (MLE) for inferring rates are limited to simpler models and can show bias, particularly in small phylogenies. Likelihood-free methods to estimate parameters of diversification models using deep learning have started to emerge, but how robust neural network methods are at handling the intricate nature of phylogenetic data remains an open question. Here we present a new ensemble neural network approach to estimate diversification parameters from phylogenetic trees that leverages different classes of neural networks (dense neural network, graph neural network, and long short-term memory recurrent network) and simultaneously learns from graph representations of phylogenies, their branching times, and their summary statistics. Our best-performing ensemble neural network (which adjusts the graph neural network result using a recurrent neural network) delivers estimates faster than MLE and shows less sensitivity to tree size for constant-rate and diversity-dependent speciation scenarios. It performs well compared with an existing convolutional network approach. However, like MLE, our approach still fails to recover parameters precisely under a protracted birth-death process. Our analysis suggests that the primary limitation to accurate parameter estimation is the amount of information contained within a phylogeny, as indicated by its size and the strength of effects shaping it. In cases where MLE is unavailable, our neural network method provides a promising alternative for estimating phylogenetic tree parameters. If detectable phylogenetic signals are present, our approach delivers results that are comparable to MLE but without inherent biases.

Indexed as

ClassificationNeural Networks, ComputerPhylogenyEnsemble LearningGraph neural networkmachine learningrecurrent neural networkregression

Identifiers

PMID40899780
PMCPMC13017624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.