ReviewHuman brain mapping2025
A Practical Guide to Identifying Robust Clusters in Neuroimaging Data.
Review in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Biological Subtyping of Brain Structure in Schizophrenia Bring Us Personalized Psychiatry?Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Article
- Human striatal population state dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Coupling between neural oscillations and white matter integrity reveals cognitive computational profiles following COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Practical Guide to Identifying Robust Clusters in Neuroimaging Data.Human brain mapping · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clustering algorithms are essential tools in data-driven research, enabling the discovery of hidden structures in complex datasets. In neuroimaging, data-driven research and clustering have been instrumental in identifying and unraveling hidden relationships. However, there are concerns associated with exploratory techniques in that they can provide erroneous results unless properly verified. Here we address this issue by examining three widely used approaches: K-means, community detection via modularity maximization, and hierarchical clustering. We first highlight their methodologies, applications, and limitations. We then discuss the critical steps for rigorous validation strategies. We further show how to apply these steps using both synthetic and real data, and provide code to facilitate their application. By contextualizing clustering within robust methodological frameworks, we demonstrate the potential of clustering-based analyses to reveal meaningful patterns and provide practical guidelines for their application in neuroscience and related fields. Clustering, when appropriately applied, is a powerful and indispensable computational method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.