ArticleChronic respiratory disease
Feasibility and acceptability of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for individuals with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Delhi, India.
Article in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesTo determine the feasibility and acceptability of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) for individuals with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).MethodsIn this single-arm feasibility trial, individuals with IPF were recruited from Delhi, India, to a 6-weeks HBPR programme using a paper-based manual. Primary outcomes were feasibility (classified by ≥60% of eligible patients recruited and ≥70% of recruited patients completing the follow-up assessment) and intervention acceptability (semi-structured interviews).ResultsOut of 42 screened, 36 individuals were eligible (86% of screened), and 30 were recruited (83% of eligible, 71% of screened; 60 ± 13 years, 53% female), with 25 completing their follow-up assessment (83% of recruited). HBPR was generally well-accepted, with qualitative themes including: 'facilitators and barriers to HBPR' (family support and flexibility of home environment were facilitators whereas lack of supervision and inability to follow a routine were barriers), 'perceived changes from taking part in HBPR' (improved exercise capacity, breathlessness, and independency), and 'how to improve HBPR in the future' (translating the manual into various languages, and incorporating into a more hybrid approach).ConclusionHBPR using a paper-based manual was feasible and acceptable, potentially suitable for improving the uptake and completion of PR for individuals with IPF in Delhi, India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.