Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40899619›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Bioinspired Provisional Matrix Stimulates Regenerative Healing of Diabetic Wounds.

Walker D Short, Phillip A Kogan, Nava P Rijal, Aditya Kaul, Benjamin W Padon, Carlos Zgheib, Hongkwan Cho, Bradley A Herbig, Bradley A King, Timothy M Crombleholme and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Bioinspired Provisional Matrix Stimulates Regenerative Healing of Diabetic Wounds.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Walker D ShortLaboratory for Regenerative Tissue Repair (LRTR), Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Phillip A KoganLaboratory for Regenerative Tissue Repair (LRTR), Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Nava P RijalBiomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Aditya KaulLaboratory for Regenerative Tissue Repair (LRTR), Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Benjamin W PadonLaboratory for Regenerative Tissue Repair (LRTR), Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Carlos ZgheibLaboratory for Fetal and Regenerative Biology (LFRB), Department of Surgery, The University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Tucson, USA.
Hongkwan ChoBiomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Bradley A HerbigBiomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Bradley A KingBiomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Timothy M CrombleholmeFetal Care Center at Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Pediatrics, Surgery, & Obstetrics/Gynecology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Swathi BalajiLaboratory for Regenerative Tissue Repair (LRTR), Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Daria A NarmonevaBiomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
Differential changes in energy metabolism in response to mechanical tension give rise to human scaring heterogeneityR01GM141366 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Swathi Balaji · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
Angiogenic Peptide Scaffolds to Enhance Diabetic Wound HealingR21DK078814 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI NARMONEVA, DARIA A. · 2008 to 2009
$460k
American Heart Association 0815371DAmerican Heart Association 836401American Heart Association BGIA-0765425BNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK078814NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141366NIH HHS 1R01GM141366-01A1NIH HHS 1R21DK078814NIH HHS 2UL1TR001425-05A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that diabetic wound treatment with biomimetic pro-angiogenic, proteolytically and mechanically stable RADA16-II peptide nanofibers promotes regenerative wound healing via attenuation of inflammation and stimulation of neovascularization. Two full-thickness excisional dorsal skin wounds were created on 8-10 week old female db/db mice and treated with nanofiber hydrogel or saline (control). Animals were euthanized on days 7, 14, 28, and 56 and their wounds were analysed for morphology, vascularization, strength, and inflammation. We observed that in situ treatment of db/db mouse wounds with nanofiber hydrogel resulted in regenerative healing, indicated by the increased presence of elastin fibrils, restored biomechanical properties, and reestablishment of a mature epidermis complete with basal, suprabasal, and stratified layers compared to saline-treated wounds. Additionally, wounds treated with nanofiber hydrogel exhibited enhanced neovascularization, increased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10, reduced expression of inflammation markers and transforming growth factor-β1 and -β2, as well as decreased myofibroblast counts. Overall, this novel drug-free approach enables accelerated diabetic wound healing by shifting inflammatory and pro-fibrotic cytokine balance towards factors associated with neovascularization-driven regenerative healing in the wound microenvironment. Our results demonstrate that in situ manipulation of the wound microenvironment using bio-mimetic peptide NF matrix may be a promising strategy for faster and more durable wound closure to improve healing of chronic wounds.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalNanofibersSkinWound HealingWounds and InjuriesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHydrogelsMiceNeovascularization, PhysiologicHydrogelsdiabetic wound healingfibrosis and scarringinflammationmechanical strengthneovascularizationpeptide nanofibers

Identifiers

PMID40899619
PMCPMC12406645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.