ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
Design Mapping: A Conceptual Framework for Co-Designing Evidence-Based Digital Mental Health Programs.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Daily Growth" Parenting Program Delivered via Ecological Momentary Intervention: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Prototype.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- "Connecting to the Earth" (Australian journal of psychology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThere is currently limited guidance on how to codesign digital mental health programs in collaboration with end-users. As a result, common barriers often prevent codesign initiatives from achieving their full potential in enhancing the effectiveness of digital mental health supports. These barriers include the exclusion of end-users from the early stages of design, a lack of attention to diversity in user experiences and needs, failure to use tools that facilitate creative and egalitarian collaboration, and prioritisation of usability over robust research methods. To address this gap, this article aims to present a novel conceptual framework, called 'Design Mapping', for developing digital mental health programs.
methodsThe Design Mapping framework was developed through a three-stage process. First, industry experts were consulted, and a review of relevant literature was conducted to identify current best practices for user collaboration in product/service development. Second, the initial conceptual development framework was created, drawing on the strengths of different approaches. Third, the framework was applied to develop a novel early childhood parenting program (called 'Active Play'), enabling the approach to be tested and refined.
resultsDesign Mapping is a three-phase framework that integrates tools from Design Thinking that emphasise meaningful and creative user collaboration, within a robust and systematic methodology inspired by Intervention Mapping. The framework also considers factors pertinent when developing both mental health and digital support programs. Preliminary findings from pilot testing of the Active Play program suggest that Design Thinking may support the development of programs that are feasible, effective and engaging.
conclusionDesign Mapping offers a novel conceptual codesign methodology for developing robust, evidence-based support programs that are responsive to diverse user needs and preferences. The next step is to evaluate its effectiveness in comparison to existing methodologies. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This article presents Design Mapping, a novel conceptual framework that offers a systematic approach to developing evidence-based digital mental health programs, emphasising meaningful and creative collaboration with end-users throughout. The primary aim of this article is to explore and address current limitations in codesign practices in the healthcare industry, consider best practice for user collaboration in the development of digital mental health programs, and provide clear and pragmatic descriptions of suggested methods, with sufficient detail to support real-world utilisation. The Design Mapping framework was conceptualised, tested and refined via the development of a novel early-childhood parenting support smartphone-app, called 'Daily Growth' (Figure 2). End-users were involved throughout the development of Daily Growth, from initial program inception through to prototype testing and refinement. This article presents an overview of the development of Daily Growth to illustrate the application of Design Mapping, with other publications providing an in-depth account of the methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.