Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40899400›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2025

Treatment Landscape for Older Men With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the United States.

Bo Zhou, Amit D Raval, Yifan Zhang, Matthew J Korn, Nethra Sambamoorthi, Rafia Rasu, Natasha Littleton, Niculae Constantinovici, Usha Sambamoorthi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bo ZhouUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9440-6295
Amit D RavalBayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, New Jersey, USA.
Yifan ZhangUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Matthew J KornBayer AG, Dexter, Michigan, USA.
Nethra SambamoorthiBayer AG, Dexter, Michigan, USA.
Rafia RasuUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Natasha LittletonBayer Ltd, Dublin, Ireland.
Niculae ConstantinoviciBayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Usha SambamoorthiUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.

Funding

Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluated treatment patterns and factors associated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) intensification with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) and/or docetaxel among older men with mHSPC in the United States.

methodsThe study utilized a retrospective cohort of 6850 older men (age ≥ 67 years) diagnosed with mHSPC between July 2016 and December 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database. Men must maintain continuous enrollment in Medicare fee-for-service Parts A/B/D for ≥ 12 months before mHSPC diagnosis and ≥ 6 months after diagnosis. Initial treatment was classified as ADT alone, ADT + ARPI, or ADT + docetaxel. Factors associated with initial treatment were examined using multivariable multinomial logistic regression.

resultsThe study cohort (mean age = 76.6 years, SD = 7.0) was mostly non-Hispanic white (77.7%), followed by non-Hispanic Black (8.4%) and Hispanic (6.5%). 30.4% received no systemic drug therapy within 6 months of mHSPC diagnosis, 47.1% received ADT alone, 14.8% received ADT + ARPI, and 5.9% received ADT + docetaxel. Among men treated with ADT, there was an increase in ADT + ARPI treatment from 19.0% to 30.0% and a concomitant decline in ADT monotherapy from 72.1% to 62.6% between 2017 and 2019, while ADT + docetaxel treatment marginally decreased from 8.8% to 7.3%. In multinomial logistic regression, men with de novo mHSPC were more likely to receive ADT + docetaxel (aOR = 2.73, 95% CI = [2.07, 3.60]) or ADT + ARPI (aOR = 1.56, 95% CI = [1.32, 1.84]); whereas men with higher frailty index were less likely to receive ADT + docetaxel (aOR = 0.93, 95% CI = [0.91, 0.95]) or ADT + ARPI (aOR = 0.97, 95% CI = [0.96, 0.98]). Specifically, ADT + ARPI was less likely to be utilized among the lower socio-economic status groups.

conclusionsThree in 10 older men with mHSPC received no systemic treatment. Although there was a gradual uptake of ARPIs, monotherapy with ADT was still highly prevalent, suggesting the integration of intensified treatment is still suboptimal. Targeted interventions are necessary to enhance guideline adherence among older and frail men with mHSPC.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overDocetaxelHumansMaleMedicareRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramUnited StatesAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsDocetaxelandrogen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI)metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)real‐world evidence (RWE)SEER Medicaretreatment intensification

Identifiers

PMID40899400
PMCPMC12405968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.