ArticleGigaScience2025
Nanopore- and AI-empowered microbial viability inference.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanopore metagenomic sequencing links clinically relevant resistance determinants to pathogens.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Sampling and analysis methods for detecting and monitoring airborne plant pathogens and fungal diversity.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026Review
- SquiDBase: a community resource of raw nanopore data from microbes.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Conference report: The Third Bacterial Genome Sequencing Pan-European Network conference.FEMS microbiology letters · 2026Article
- Wastewater-based epidemiology for public health - benefits and trade-offs of different molecular methods for the generation of actionable data in a small-town context.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence with genome sequencing against antimicrobial resistance: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- A whole-genome sequencing dataset of nanopore raw signals for bacterial genotyping and methylation analysis.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Review
- From air to insight: the evolution of airborne DNA sequencing technologies.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2025Review
- Nanopore- and AI-empowered microbial viability inference.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in bacterial diagnostics and surveillance of anti-microbial resistance.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe ability to differentiate between viable and dead microorganisms in metagenomic data is crucial for various microbial inferences, ranging from assessing ecosystem functions of environmental microbiomes to inferring the virulence of potential pathogens from metagenomic analysis. Established viability-resolved genomic approaches are labor-intensive as well as biased and lacking in sensitivity.
resultsWe here introduce a new fully computational framework that leverages nanopore sequencing technology to assess microbial viability directly from freely available nanopore signal data. Our approach utilizes deep neural networks to learn features from such raw nanopore signal data that can distinguish DNA from viable and dead microorganisms in a controlled experimental setting of UV-induced Escherichia cell death. The application of explainable artificial intelligence (AI) tools then allows us to pinpoint the signal patterns in the nanopore raw data that allow the model to make viability predictions at high accuracy. Using the model predictions as well as explainable AI, we show that our framework can be leveraged in a real-world application to estimate the viability of obligate intracellular Chlamydia, where traditional culture-based methods suffer from inherently high false-negative rates. This application shows that our viability model captures predictive patterns in the nanopore signal that can be utilized to predict viability across taxonomic boundaries. We finally show the limits of our model's generalizability through antibiotic exposure of a simple mock microbial community, where a new model specific to the killing method had to be trained to obtain accurate viability predictions.
conclusionsWhile the potential of our computational framework's generalizability and applicability to metagenomic studies needs to be assessed in more detail, we here demonstrate for the first time the analysis of freely available nanopore signal data to infer the viability of microorganisms, with many potential applications in environmental, veterinary, and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.