Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40898965›Full record

ArticleArchives of craniofacial surgery2025

Pre-lacrimal window maxillary sinus surgery: a computed tomography analysis and classification.

Mohammad Waheed El-Anwar, Mohamed Kamel Alawady, Mohamed Alshawadfy, Mohamed Mohamed Rabea, Atef Hussein Elsayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of craniofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad Waheed El-AnwarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Mohamed Kamel AlawadyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed AlshawadfyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Mohamed Mohamed RabeaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Atef Hussein ElsayedDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pre-lacrimal window (PLW) approach is a promising technique for accessing otherwise inaccessible maxillary sinus lesions. The objective of this study was to determine the computed tomography (CT) dimensions, measurements, and grading of the PLW.

methodsOne hundred paranasal CT scans were included in the study. For all subjects, axial images were obtained, and multiplanar reformats were used to obtain detailed views in the coronal and sagittal planes. The width of the PLW, the width of the nasolacrimal duct (NLD), and the angle between the axis of the NLD and the hard palate were measured and graded.

resultsIn 100 CT scans (200 sides), the mean PLW width was 5.6± 2.4 mm (range, 0-11.15 mm), the mean NLD width was 6.38± 1.84 mm (range, 1-11 mm), and the mean angle between the axis of the NLD and the hard palate was 68.6°± 6.77° (range, 54°-83°). There were no significant differences between sides or genders for any of the measurements.

conclusionThe CT dimensions of the PLW should be carefully evaluated when considering different endoscopic approaches to, or through, the anterior aspect of the maxillary sinus. The current study enhances surgeon and radiologist awareness of PLW measurements and their variations, ultimately improving the application of the PLW approach.

Indexed as

EndoscopyMaxillary sinusNasolacrimal duct

Identifiers

PMID40898965
PMCPMC12415367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.