ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Fitting and diversity of lactation curves in Saanen dairy goats.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The shapes of lactation curves are affected by genetic and environmental factors, and flexible models are required to fit such curves. This study aimed to compare the effects of the Gaussian process regression model (Gaussian model) for fitting lactation curves of Saanen dairy goats versus the parametric Wood's model. In addition, we investigated the effects of environmental factors on the shape of lactation curves. Principal component analysis (PCA) detected 3 (541 lactations fitted using the Wood's model [WDS]), 5 (raw data from the WDS fitted using the Gaussian model [GWDS]), and 6 (1,032 lactation datasets fitted using the Gaussian model [GDS]) principal components (PCs). The interpretation of PC1 and PC2 in the 3 datasets was consistent, with PC1 accounting for total milk production, PC2 accounting for persistency (reflecting the difference between early and late lactation), PC3 accounting for milk yield in early lactation (WDS) and relative milk yield in mid-lactation (GWDS and GDS), and PC4 to 6 being associated with fluctuations throughout lactation. The lactation curves of 3 datasets were clustered into 2 (WDS), 2 (GWDS), and 3 (GDS) clusters based on their PC scores, and mainly differed in total milk production and persistency. The total milk production increased from the first to the third parities, but the mid-term relative milk production was highest in first-parity goats. Compared with kidding in spring, kidding in winter led to higher total milk production and persistency, and lower mid-term relative milk production. Low persistency was detected when the number of kids was ≥2. The Gaussian model is suitable for fitting daily milk yield records, with the main sources of variance in the lactation curves of Saanen goats in China being total milk yield and persistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.