ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Effects of intravenous lipopolysaccharide administration on physiological and ruminal responses that modulate feed intake in beef cattle.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This experiment evaluated feed intake, physiological reactions, and ruminal parameters in beef cattle receiving or not receiving a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge. Ten ruminally-cannulated Angus steers [590 ± 16 kg of body weight (BW)] were housed in individual pens on day -7, ranked by BW, and allocated to 1 of 2 treatments administered intravenously on day 0: 1) 0.5 μg/kg of BW of bacterial LPS (Escherichia coli 0111:B4) diluted in 5 mL of 0.9% sterile saline, or 2) 5 mL of 0.9% physiological saline (CON). Steers had free-choice access to wheat hay, water, and a commercial vitamin + mineral mix (days -7 to 7). Hay dry matter intake (DMI) was evaluated daily from days -5 to 7. Prior to treatment administration on day 0 (hour 0), polyester bags containing 4 g of ground dietary hay (DM basis) were immersed into the rumen of each steer, and incubated for 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h for dry matter (DM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) degradability evaluation. Steers were also intra-ruminally pulse-dosed with 5 g of Co-EDTA and with Cr-EDTA (0.1 g/kg of BW) prior to treatment administration. Rumen fluid samples were collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48 h, and blood samples were collected at -2, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, and 144 h relative treatment administration. Values obtained before treatment administration were used as covariates within each respective analysis. Steers receiving LPS had less (P ≤ 0.05) hay DMI on days 0 and 1, less (P < 0.01) rumen liquid volume and dilution rate, and less (P < 0.01) ruminal effective degradability of DM and NDF compared with CON. Steers receiving LPS had greater (P ≤ 0.05) plasma haptoglobin concentration from 18 to 144 h, greater (P ≤ 0.04) plasma cortisol concentration from 2 to 12 h, and less (P ≤ 0.04) total plasma Cr concentration from 2 to 18 h compared with CON. Steers receiving LPS had less (P ≤ 0.03) mean concentrations of acetate, butyrate, valerate, and total volatile fatty acids (VFA) in the rumen fluid compared with CON. Steers receiving LPS had less (P ≤ 0.05) mean total bacterial load in the ruminal fluid, and less mean prevalence of the phyla Spirochaetes and Fibrobacteres and the genera Treponema compared with CON. Results from this experiment suggest that LPS administration elicited host-microbiome endocrine interactions that impaired feed degradability and VFA production in the rumen, particularly a reduction in total bacterial load, which may have contributed to a 48-h decrease in hay DMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.