Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40898444›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & misuse2026

Content Analysis of Derived Intoxicating Cannabis Vape Product Attributes and Marketing In an Online Retail Environment.

Julia Chen-Sankey, Cassidy R LoParco, Kathryn La Capria, Siyan Meng, Rosanna Mazzeo, Neha Vijayakumar, Amanda Y Kong, Kayla K Tillett, Carla J Berg, Matthew E Rossheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & misuse, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julia Chen-SankeyRutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Cassidy R LoParcoMilken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Kathryn La CapriaRutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Siyan MengRutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Rosanna MazzeoRutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Neha VijayakumarRutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Amanda Y KongWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8361-7342
Kayla K TillettCollege of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Carla J BergMilken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Matthew E RossheimCollege of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

Funding

Socio-structural determinants of cannabis and derived psychoactive cannabis product use and consequences among young adultsF32DA060612 · NIDA · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LOPARCO, CASSIDY R · 2024 to 2025
$101k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA060612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe 2018 U.S. Farm Bill unintentionally resulted in the proliferation of derived intoxicating cannabis vape products (DICVPs), raising concerns about associated health risks. To inform prevention efforts, this study analyzed the product attributes and marketing features of DICVPs sold online, particularly features that could attract youth or lower risk perception.

methodsIn 2023, product attributes and descriptions of 490 flavored DICVPs were extracted from two online retail websites. In 2024, two trained coders thematically coded product descriptions for their product marketing features.

resultsOverall, 95 unique brands and 26 unique intoxicating cannabinoids were identified. The most frequent marketing features overall were vape product design and use (99.0%), including vaping satisfaction, discreetness, convenience, and use instructions. Regulation and compliance messages (91.6%) were also prevalent, including lab testing for additives and/or chemicals, health warnings, hemp-derived labels, references to the Farm Bill, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval statements. Other prominent themes included: flavor and sensation claims (79.6%, i.e., flavor variety, fruit flavors); psychoactive effect claims (43.3%, e.g., potency or expected user experience); product quality claims (38.4%, e.g., "quality," "natural," "purity"); and other positive effect claims (33.9%, e.g., mood enhancement, relaxation). DISCUSSION: The DICVP online marketplace is highly fragmented with a variety of brands and intoxicating compounds. Common marketing strategies promoting appealing flavors and positive vaping experiences may increase their appeal to young people. Features related to product legality and quality may reduce perceived risks and barriers to using products. Continuous monitoring of the DICVP marketplace is needed to inform policymaking.

Indexed as

CannabinoidsCannabisElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsMarketingVapingCommerceHumansInternetUnited StatesCannabinoidscannabis advertisingCannabis marketingcannabis product descriptionsderived cannabis vape productsonline retailers

Identifiers

PMID40898444
PMCPMC12486249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.