ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Scalability and scaling-up strategy of a physical activity policy intervention in Australian childcare centres.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing an implementation strategy to scale a community-based football intervention for Men's health: an implementation science study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Enhancing healthy eating and active play in the Australian early childhood education and care system.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is an urgent need for scalable interventions to promote physical activity in early childhood. An early childhood education and care (ECEC) physical activity policy intervention with implementation support strategies (Play Active) has been proposed for scale-up in Australia. This study sought to assess the scalability of Play Active and describe the Play Active scaling-up strategy. The Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool was used to assess scalability. The PRACTical planning for Implementation and Scale-up (PRACTIS) guided the scaling-up strategy and involved: (i) characterizing the implementation setting; (ii) identifying existing/new partnerships; (iii) identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation; (iv) addressing barriers through adaptations. The Play Active scalability assessment domains with the highest scores (>2.5/3) were for the problem, intervention, reach and acceptability. Four additional domains scored highly (>2/3): fidelity and adaptation, delivery settings and workforce, implementation infrastructure, and strategic/political context. The lowest scores (<2/3) were the evidence of effectiveness, intervention costs and benefits, and sustainability domains. The PRACTIS guide showed that the implementation setting and existing and new partnerships were appropriate for scaling-up Play Active. The PRACTIS guide also identified key barriers (e.g. staff time) and enablers (e.g. staff professional development) to implementation at scale. Adaptations were identified to address these barriers (e.g. intervention delivery via a customised website). Overall, the scalability assessment revealed gaps in some scalability domains to be addressed through further research and adaptation of Play Active. The proposed scale-up trial evaluation is crucial to support decision-makers to fund, scale and institutionalize Play Active in the real world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.