ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Delineating blood DNA methylation biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delineating blood DNA methylation biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epigenetic mechanisms act as mediators of genetic and environmental influences. In Alzheimer's disease, blood-based DNA methylation signatures are increasingly being explored as minimally invasive peripheral biomarkers. We previously reported associations between blood DNA methylation in the CHI3L1 gene (encoding YKL-40) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of YKL-40, a marker of neuroinflammation. These findings have now been replicated in an independent study (Kaleck et al. 2025), reinforcing their robustness and biological relevance. We also reported associations between DNA methylation and CSF neurofilament light chain levels, a marker of axonal damage, which were not independently replicated in the analyses by Kaleck et al. Several factors may have contributed to this inconsistency in results, which we discuss in detail as they are relevant to future DNA methylation-based studies in the field. Together, these findings highlight both the potential and the complexity of identifying consistent blood-based epigenomic signatures for neurodegenerative processes. They also underscore the importance of harmonizing methodologies across studies to improve reproducibility and, eventually, to yield meaningful biomarkers allowing an early detection of this devastating disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.