ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2026
Analgesic practices for acute pain management in cats and dogs in Africa.
Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute pain in cats: knowledge, attitudes and practices among Argentine veterinarians - a survey-based study.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- The effects of observer gender on feline acute pain assessment using three pain scoring instruments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo understand perceptions and analgesic practices for acute pain management in cats and dogs by veterinarians in Africa. MATERIALS AND
methodsData from small animal veterinarians were collected using an online questionnaire (English/French) and convenience sampling. Pain management practices and perceptions of veterinarians were analysed using multiple correspondence analysis.
resultsA total of 249 participants completed the survey from 20 countries. The readily available opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and local anaesthetics were morphine (n = 90; 36.1%), meloxicam (n = 200; 80.3%) and lidocaine (n = 245; 98.4%), respectively. The majority of participants reported not using pain assessment instruments for perioperative pain in cats (n = 169; 67.9%) or dogs (n = 170; 68.3%). Feline Grimace Scale (n = 27; 10.8%) and Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (n = 30; 12.0%) were the most commonly used instruments in cats and dogs, respectively. Multiple correspondence analysis identified one cluster representing high knowledge of pain assessment, use of peri-operative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids, pain assessment instruments and recommendations of ongoing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy after ovariohysterectomy. The second cluster represented low knowledge of pain assessment, non-use of peri-operative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids, non-use of pain assessment instruments and no recommendations for ongoing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy after ovariohysterectomy. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Low knowledge and limited access to analgesics were associated with the non-use of perioperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids, pain assessment tools and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy following ovariohysterectomy. Continuing education programs and improved drug availability are essential for improving pain management in cats and dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.