ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2025
Predictive value of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire for respiratory depression risk in patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for perioperative respiratory complications. The STOP-Bang Questionnaire (SBQ) is a widely used screening tool; however, its utility in predicting respiratory depression during deep sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy warrants further exploration. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of the SBQ for respiratory depression in this patient population.
methodsThis prospective observational cohort study enrolled patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy under deep sedation at Dongguan Binhaiwan Central Hospital from November 2024 to February of the following year. The data collected included demographics, medical history, vital signs, and SBQ scores. Standard sedation monitoring was complemented by portable sleep monitoring systems to record the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI). Patients were grouped based on their lowest intraoperative pulse oximetry (SpO₂) level. Spearman correlation, Kappa test, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and binary logistic regression were used to analyze the relationships between SBQ scores, AHI, and respiratory depression events.
resultsData of 349 patients were included in the final analysis. Transient hypoxemia (SpO₂ < 90%) occurred in 65 (18.6%) patients, with 12 (3.4%) patients experiencing severe hypoxemia (SpO₂ < 80%). Both SBQ scores and AHI demonstrated significant negative correlations with SpO₂ levels (r = -0.520 and r = -0.737, respectively; both P < 0.001). Using SpO₂ < 85% as the threshold, the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) for the SBQ score was 0.942. The optimal SBQ cutoff value was 2.5, yielding a sensitivity of 0.871 and a specificity of 0.912. Logistic regression identified snoring (OR = 14.240), observed apnea (OR = 7.092), and elevated BMI (OR = 10.904) as independent predictors of severe hypoxemia.
conclusionRespiratory depression events are relatively common during deeply sedated gastroenteroscopies. The SBQ score effectively predicts this risk, particularly in identifying patients susceptible to severe hypoxemia. An SBQ score ≥ 3 serves as a practical threshold for recognizing high-risk individuals, with snoring, observed apnea, and high BMI as key warning indicators. SBQ is a valid and concise preoperative screening tool for this patient group. CLINICAL
trial registrationRegistry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Preoperative Assessment of Hypoxia Risk in Painless GI Endoscopy; URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=272808 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.