ArticleTrials2025
Study protocol: COPD-eosinophil-guided reduction of inhaled corticosteroids (COPERNICOS) : A randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, four-arm intervention clinical trial on eosinophil-guided time-updated person-specific reduction of inhaled corticosteroid therapy and prophylactic low dose Azithromycin therapy in patients with severe or very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04481555 (Eosinophil-guided Reduction of Inhaled Corticosteroids), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Eosinophil-guided Reduction of Inhaled Corticosteroids
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correlation between anemia-related red blood cell parameters and pulmonary function severity in patients with AECOPD.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is frequently used for COPD. Based on the considerable adverse effects and the knowledge that many such patients do not gain benefit from this treatment, it remains unresolved whether ICS treatment can be managed with lower doses, or via an ICS-sparing strategy with periods with and without this medicine. The blood eosinophil count is a useful biomarker for steroid-responsive airway inflammation, and we want to investigate whether an individualized and eosinophil-guided approach on ICS treatment reduces ICS over-treatment and side effects. High-dose (500 mg thrice weekly or 250 mg daily) long-term azithromycin has been shown to reduce acute exacerbations of COPD in selected patients. Frequent gastro-intestinal adverse effects remain a challenge, but many patients tolerate lower doses; however, the effect of the treatment at lower doses is unknown, although many physicians prefer such doses. We want to investigate whether oral low-dose prophylactic azithromycin 250 mg three times weekly reduces acute exacerbations of COPD and improves time alive and out of hospital.
methodsThis is an ongoing, actively recruiting randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, four-arm factorial intervention clinical trial aiming to recruit 444 patients with specialist verified COPD GOLD risk class E and/or FEV1 < 30% who are currently on ICS. The patients are followed for one year and are randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of the four treatment arms: (1) eosinophil-guided ICS-sparing treatment and low-dose azithromycin, (2) eosinophil-guided ICS treatment and placebo, (3) continued ICS treatment and low-dose azithromycin, or (4) continued ICS treatment and placebo. If blood-eosinophils (measured every 3 months) are < 0.3 × 10 DISCUSSION: Severe ICS-adverse effects like bacterial infections should be reduced. The ICS-sparing intervention, we test, may provide a useful tool to do this safely. Azithromycin low-dose prophylaxis is practiced by many physicians. This trial will provide evidence of whether this is effective.
trial registrationClinTrials.gov. NCT04481555. Registered on 14 AUG 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04481555 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.