ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Comparative metabolomic analysis of human lung slices (hu-PCLS) exposed to either standard or FLASH protons: a pilot study.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent advances in radiation biology and preclinical research have identified that high doses of radiation at ultra-high dose rate can lead to sparing of normal tissue, while maintaining tumor control. This has been termed the FLASH effect and has been extended from electrons to protons, heavy ions and photons. Lung cancer treatments, despite the advancements in radiotherapy with precise protons, are still associated with significant damage to the normal tissue. FLASH proton exposures have not been characterized yet with regards to lung tissue injury or sparing.
methodsIn this pilot study we used precision cut lung slices from human healthy non-smoker donors, two male and one female, and exposed this ex vivo model to a single dose of 12 Gy of standard or FLASH protons and analyzed them with untargeted metabolomics at 24 h after exposure.
resultsWe identified 22 metabolites of interest, with primary enrichment in β-alanine metabolism, sphingolipid metabolism, primary bile acid biosynthesis, and one carbon pool by folate, while chemical classes showed that sphingoid bases and eicosanoids were two of the most enriched chemical classes after radiation exposure. Classification analysis with receiver operating characteristic curves based on the 22 metabolites indicated the presence of individual variability to responses, that warrant future studies with a larger cohort.
conclusionsAlthough this is a pilot study, we show the utility of ex vivo models in radiation research and particularly with standard and FLASH protons, and that further research in this area should include both male and female subjects. This ex vivo human model should therefore be investigated further to identify early responses to proton exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.