ReviewPatient safety in surgery2025
Viewing patient safety in surgery through the lens of a theatrical performance: a narrative review.
Review in Patient safety in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient safety culture in the operating room of African hospitals: a systematic review.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Review
- Randomized controlled trial evaluating mixed reality technology for training scrub nurses in anterior cervical spine surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Surgical interruptions and preventable delays in the operating rooms of academic teaching hospitals.Patient safety in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the high-stakes environment of the operating room (OR), patient safety depends not only on technical expertise but also on seamless communication, clear roles, and coordinated teamwork. Traditional approaches often overlook the relational and performative dimensions of surgical care.
methodsThis narrative article proposes a metaphorical framework that compares surgical practice to live theater, where each team member plays a rehearsed role, and protocols act as scripts. The study explores key themes such as preparation (rehearsals), intraoperative coordination (live performance), and structured debriefing (curtain call). The aim is to synthesize knowledge from clinical literature and human factors theory to provide a novel interpretive framework for improving patient safety in the operating room (OR). A selective literature review was conducted focusing on peer-reviewed publications related to surgical teamwork, communication, safety checklists, and non-technical skills. Sources were identified through PubMed and Google Scholar using relevant terms such as "surgical safety," "human factors in surgery," and "team communication."
resultsThe metaphorical framework reveals that each member of the OR team-from the surgeon to the scrub nurse-is reimagined as a theatrical role, with their contribution being essential to the surgical outcome. Key concepts such as simulation training, checklists, psychological safety, and mutual accountability are highlighted as critical tools for enhancing performance and reducing preventable harm. The study emphasizes the importance of clear role definitions, team coordination, and continuous learning, similar to a theater production's preparation, performance, and reflection stages.
conclusionViewing the OR through the lens of theater offers a novel, human-centered model for improving surgical safety. This conceptual framework promotes structured teamwork, shared mental models, and a culture where every action is intentional and every role is respected ensuring that each surgical performance prioritizes the patient's well-being above all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.