Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40898279›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2025

Validated methods for isolation and qualification of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells from different sources.

Vincenzo Mattei, Francesca Santilli, Fanny Pulcini, Jessica Fabrizi, Loreto Lancia, Costantino Santacroce, Francesca Megiorni, Simona Ceccarelli, Emanuela Paldino, Roberto Gramignoli and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Editorial: Advances in dental pulp stem cell biology and applications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Vincenzo MatteiDepartment of Life Science, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy. v.mattei@unilink.it.
Francesca SantilliDepartment of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy.
Fanny PulciniDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Jessica FabriziDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Loreto LanciaDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Costantino SantacroceIndependent researcher, Rieti, Italy.
Francesca MegiorniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Simona CeccarelliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Emanuela PaldinoDepartment of Life Science, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy.
Roberto GramignoliUOSD Cell Therapy Lab, IRCCS Istituto G. Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Maria G RoubelakisLaboratory of Biology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Sadri BaharehRoyan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Tehran, Iran.
Massoud VosoughRoyan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Tehran, Iran.
Sveva BolliniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Umberto GalderisiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Antonio Jose SalgadoLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
Antonio AngeloniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Cinzia MarcheseDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Simona Delle MonacheDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy. simona.dellemonache@univaq.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8153-915X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells (MSCs) have attracted considerable attention in the field of regenerative medicine. Their unique properties make them suitable for various therapeutic applications. This article reviews accepted methods and guidelines for the isolation and characterization of MSCs from various sources. Common sources include bone marrow, adipose tissue, perinatal and umbilical cord tissue, dental pulp, etc. Naturally, the techniques used to isolate MSCs can vary depending on the source from which they are derived. However, several methods have been widely accepted by the scientific community. These include enzymatic digestion, density gradient centrifugation, the use of Percoll, adherence-based techniques and selective culture conditions. To characterize MSCs, basic criteria established by the International Society for Cell and Tissue Transplantation and the International Federation for Adipose Tissue are routinely used. These criteria include the ability of MSCs to adhere to plastic surfaces under standard culture conditions, the expression of specific membrane markers and their differentiation potential. Various techniques are used to assess these characteristics, including mixed lymphocyte reactions, flow cytometry and immunophenotyping profiles. These assessments aim to confirm the purity of the MSCs and validate their mesenchymal properties. In summary, the isolation and characterization of MSCs requires careful consideration of the different available methods. Each source presents unique challenges and advantages. By following established guidelines, researchers can ensure successful isolation and characterization of MSCs. This knowledge will ultimately improve their use in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Cell SeparationMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansImmunophenotypingReproducibility of ResultsCharacterization of MSCsIsolation of MSCsMesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs)

Identifiers

PMID40898279
PMCPMC12403454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.