Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40898276›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025

A cluster randomised feasibility trial assessing an interactive film intervention to improve wellbeing of young people in school settings in the North of England.

F Christie-de Jong, E Walker, H Corlett, C Hardarce, E Soulsby, B Arnott, K Franks, J Ling, J Stephenson, L B Azevedo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06807931 (Impact of an Interactive Film-based Intervention on Resilience, Mental Wellbeing and Help-seeking Attitudes in Young People), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06807931 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of an Interactive Film-based Intervention on Resilience, Mental Wellbeing and Help-seeking Attitudes in Young People (14-18) At School Settings in North East of England: a Mixed-methods Cluster Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SunderlandRan2021 to 2023Enrolled175ConditionsMental Wellbeing, Resilience, Help-Seeking BehaviourArmsInteractive film
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

F Christie-de JongSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK. floor.christie@sunderland.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-8030
E WalkerSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
H CorlettNortheast and North Cumbria Child Health and Wellbeing Network, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
C HardarceFaculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
E SoulsbyNortheast and North Cumbria Child Health and Wellbeing Network, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
B ArnottPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
K FranksYouth Focus North East, Gateshead, UK.
J LingFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
J StephensonDepartment of Allied Health Professions, Sport and Exercise, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
L B AzevedoSchool of Sport and Physical Activity, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria OFC20-57
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescence is a critical period for the onset of mental illness. A partnership of a health and care network and filmmakers developed an interactive film for youth wellbeing. While such films have potential as a cost-effective preventative tool, their effectiveness remains unproven. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial of the interactive film intervention to improve wellbeing in school-aged youth.

methodsIn a mixed-methods cluster randomised feasibility trial in North East England (2021-2022), students in years 10 (14-15 years) and 12 (16-17 years) from three schools were recruited and randomised to the following conditions: (1) watching the film in class, (2) watching the film in class with support from youth workers or (3) regular class activities. Feasibility outcomes included willingness of schools to participate, participant recruitment, and retention, which were assessed quantitatively and qualitatively. Data were analysed descriptively and with the use of thematic analysis.

resultsSchool recruitment targets were met, although this was challenging due to resource constraints and the COVID-19 pandemic. Questionnaires were completed before watching the film by 172 students (48% of the recruitment target). Follow-up targets for retention were met at 3 months (n = 138) and 6 months (n = 136). Retention of year 10 students was high (96%), but year 12 students had lower retention (60%). Qualitative findings showed students and teachers supported the intervention and trial and measurements; however, consent-taking required more time. Communication and resource issues within schools were challenging and need addressing before moving to a larger trial.

conclusionAlthough some trial aspects were feasible and acceptable, particularly the intervention, others, such as recruitment, retention and school communication, posed challenges. We recommend future feasibility studies should address barriers such as randomisation, communication with schools, recruitment of older students (16-18 years), consent and measurement alignment before moving to a larger-scale trial.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06807931. Retrospectively registered 04 February 2025 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06807931 .

Indexed as

Feasibility studyInteractive film interventionMental healthYoung peopleYouth engagement

Identifiers

PMID40898276
PMCPMC12406547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.