Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40898260›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2025

Mapping the health outcomes of menstrual inequity: a comprehensive scoping review.

Andrea García-Egea, Georgina Pujolar-Díaz, Astrid Boe Hüttel, Anna Sofie Holst, Constanza Jacques-Aviñó, Laura Medina-Perucha

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea García-Egea *Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587 attic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
Georgina Pujolar-Díaz *Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587 attic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
Astrid Boe HüttelFundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587 attic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna Sofie HolstFundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587 attic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
Constanza Jacques-AviñóFundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587 attic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura Medina-PeruchaFundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 587 attic, 08007, Barcelona, Spain. lmedina@idiapjgol.org.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III RD21/0016/0029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMenstrual inequity refers to the systematic and avoidable differences experienced by women and people who menstruate, based on having a menstrual cycle and menstruating. Given the paucity of prior research examining the impact of menstrual inequity on health, a scoping review was conducted to explore and map out the menstrual inequities and their association with health outcomes in women and people who menstruate within the published academic literature. METHODOLOGY: Two searches were conducted in May 2022 and March 2024 in PubMed and Scopus. Academic literature published until December 2023 was included. Following the screening process, 74 articles published between 1990 and 2023 were included in the review. Results were then synthesised through narrative analysis and organised into nine categories.

resultsA range of both physical and emotional health outcomes were documented to be associated with menstrual inequity. Urinary tract infection, reproductive tract infection, and other genital discomforts (e.g. itching) were linked to certain menstrual discomforts (e.g. dysmenorrhea) as well as a lack of access to menstrual products, menstrual management facilities and/or menstrual information. The emotional health outcomes, especially anxiety, distress and depression, were salient and were shown to be related to menstrual stigma, the lack of menstrual information and the limited access to menstrual-related healthcare.

conclusionsThe majority of the included studies were focused on menstrual management, being one of the most addressed themes concerning menstruation, and the health outcomes were mainly reproductive tract infection and emotional/mental health. Expanding the range of health outcomes studied will strengthen research and inform policy. Further research is needed to better understand the complex association between menstrual inequities and other potential health outcomes.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesMenstruationMenstruation DisturbancesFemaleHumansEmotional healthHealth outcomesMenstrual inequityMenstruationReproductive tract infectionsScoping reviewSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID40898260
PMCPMC12406439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.