ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Effect of microscope-assisted modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion and impact on lumbar lordosis and intervertebral height.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of microscope-assisted modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion (micro-XOLIF) and to compare its impact on lumbar sagittal plane imaging parameters with extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF).
methodsWe retrospectively collected the data of patients who underwent XLIF and micro-XOLIF in our hospital. We compared general data, medical records, and imaging parameters of both groups, including lumbar sagittal balance and postoperative intervertebral height. We evaluated operative efficacy through complications, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at each follow-up time.
resultsThere was no significant difference in general data between the two groups. In the micro-XOLIF group, cages were predominantly placed in the anterior part of the intervertebral space, showing notable improvement in anterior intervertebral height and segmental lordosis. Postoperative ODI and VAS scores decreased significantly in both groups. VAS score of micro-XOLIF group was lower than that of XLIF group 3 days after operation, but there was no significant difference in ODI and VAS scores between the two groups in other time periods. The incidence of vertebral collapse and neurological complications in micro-XOLIF group was also lower than that in XLIF group.
conclusionsMicroscope-assisted modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion, utilizing a simple retractor, reduces the equipment needs for lateral lumbar fusion, aids in identifying crucial anatomical structures, and diminishes risks associated with lateral surgery and nerve-related complications. Additionally, micro-XOLIF effectively restores lumbar lordosis and reduces vertebral collapse rates through anterior cage placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.