ArticleBMC women's health2025
Loneliness and analgesic overuse among low-dose estrogen-progestin users in Japan.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLoneliness is related to menstrual disorders and medication use. Loneliness and pain are related and may be associated with analgesic use. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of concomitant analgesic use and overuse, and to clarify factors associated with loneliness and analgesic overuse among women who are low-dose estrogen-progestin (LEP) users.
methodsWomen in their 20s and 30s were randomly selected from a research company's web panel (Macromill, Inc.) and LEP users were screened. The survey included analgesic concomitant use days per month and the Three-Item Loneliness Scale (TIL). Logistic regression analysis was performed with high TIL score (≥ 6) and analgesic use ≥ 10 days per month as the objective variables.
resultsA total of 516 valid responses from LEP users were analyzed. Among them, 64.1% reported concomitant analgesic use on ≥ 1 day per month, 11.2% on ≥ 10 days per month, and 45.7% had high TIL score. High TIL score was significantly associated with concomitant analgesic use on ≥ 1 day per month (odds ratio [OR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.18-2.63, p = 0.006). Concomitant analgesic use on ≥ 10 days per month was significantly associated with endometriosis (OR 5.25, 95%CI 2.15-12.81, p < 0.001) and concomitant analgesic use for low back pain (OR 4.67, 95%CI 1.65-13.18, p = 0.04).
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first detailed study to investigate concomitant analgesic use and overuse among LEP users. Loneliness was found to be prevalent in this population and was associated with concomitant analgesic use, potentially reflecting underlying patterns of frequent or habitual analgesic intake. Furthermore, concomitant analgesic overuse was linked to conditions such as endometriosis and low back pain, underscoring the importance of medication monitoring that takes into account both loneliness and the self-recording of menstrual symptoms. Greater attention by healthcare professionals to the psychosocial context of concomitant analgesic overuse and loneliness may facilitate more meaningful patient dialogue and contribute to improved quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.