ArticleBMC cancer2025
Overall survival following radical surgery and postoperative chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients aged ≥ 70 years: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical spotlight review: best practices for the management of colorectal cancer in the emergency and acute care setting.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) predominantly affects the elderly, with a growing demand for evidence-based treatment strategies in this population. The influence of comorbidities and frailty on survival outcomes following postoperative chemotherapy in elderly CRC patients remains unclear.
methodFrom the Korean National Health Insurance database, we analyzed 200,000 randomly sampled colorectal cancer patients (C18-20) diagnosed between 2009 and 2016. Patients under 20, those with inflammatory bowel disease, preoperative chemotherapy (except neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer), missing data, or death within 6 months post-surgery were excluded. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival, adjusted for demographic factors. Subgroup and interaction analyses assessed effect modification by age, sex, and income. Incidence rates were reported per 1,000 person-years.
resultAmong 2,142 patients, 44.2% received postoperative chemotherapy. Chemotherapy recipients were younger and had lower overall mortality in the unadjusted analysis. However, after adjustment, postoperative chemotherapy was associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.44, 95% CI: 1.10-1.87) in patients aged ≥ 70 years. The impact of chemotherapy on survival was more pronounced in younger patients. Comorbidity and frailty emerged as significant prognostic factors, potentially outweighing the benefits of adjuvant therapy in the elderly.
conclusionIn elderly CRC patients, comorbidity and frailty may play a dominant role in determining overall survival, potentially exceeding the impact of tumor-directed treatments such as postoperative chemotherapy. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive geriatric assessment and individualized treatment planning in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.