SynthesisBMC urology2025
Pelvic floor rehabilitation before radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of Modified Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Intrafascial Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer and Analysis of Factors Influencing Postoperative Urinary Continence Recovery.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle strengthening before radical prostatectomy. METHODOLOGY: A search of publications was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Enfispo for articles published from 2019 to September 2024. A total of 199 articles were reviewed, of which 6 were selected and peer-reviewed using the CASPe questionnaire to assess methodological quality, resulting in the inclusion of 5 studies with a total of 642 participants.
resultsPelvic floor prehabilitation in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy aims to improve urinary continence, sexual function and quality of life. The studies analyzed show significant methodological variability, adding difficulty in comparing the results. Treatments that combine pelvic floor exercises with aerobic and resistance training show better functional recovery and continence outcomes. Less intensive programs do not show significant differences between groups. Studies with longer durations demonstrate clearer benefits, while shorter follow-up periods limit the evaluation of long-term efficacy. Additionally, few studies address erectile dysfunction, despite its impact on quality of life.
conclusionPelvic floor prehabilitation may help improve urinary continence following radical prostatectomy; however, there is a paucity of studies evaluating its application prior to surgery, and considerable variability exists in treatment protocols. No standardized clinical protocol exists, which hinders result comparisons. Although prehabilitation shows promising potential, current studies present heterogeneous results. Clinical trials are needed to standardize interventions, expand sample sizes, and conduct long-term follow-ups to consolidate evidence and improve patient care. PROSPERO REGISTER: Prospero Register: CRD42024619694.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.