Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40898154›Full record

SynthesisBMC urology2025

Pelvic floor rehabilitation before radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Oscar Aguila-Gimeno, Alba Jareño-Vicens, Clàudia Triñaque Recasens

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oscar Aguila-GimenoUniversity Hospital Santa Maria of Lleida, Gestió de Serveis Sanitaris, Av. Alcalde Rovira Roure 44, 25198, Lleida, Spain. oscarkinelleida@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5672-4169
Alba Jareño-VicensUniversity Hospital Santa Maria of Lleida, Gestió de Serveis Sanitaris, Av. Alcalde Rovira Roure 44, 25198, Lleida, Spain. alba.jareno@gmail.com.
Clàudia Triñaque RecasensUniversity Hospital Santa Maria of Lleida, Gestió de Serveis Sanitaris, Av. Alcalde Rovira Roure 44, 25198, Lleida, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle strengthening before radical prostatectomy. METHODOLOGY: A search of publications was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Enfispo for articles published from 2019 to September 2024. A total of 199 articles were reviewed, of which 6 were selected and peer-reviewed using the CASPe questionnaire to assess methodological quality, resulting in the inclusion of 5 studies with a total of 642 participants.

resultsPelvic floor prehabilitation in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy aims to improve urinary continence, sexual function and quality of life. The studies analyzed show significant methodological variability, adding difficulty in comparing the results. Treatments that combine pelvic floor exercises with aerobic and resistance training show better functional recovery and continence outcomes. Less intensive programs do not show significant differences between groups. Studies with longer durations demonstrate clearer benefits, while shorter follow-up periods limit the evaluation of long-term efficacy. Additionally, few studies address erectile dysfunction, despite its impact on quality of life.

conclusionPelvic floor prehabilitation may help improve urinary continence following radical prostatectomy; however, there is a paucity of studies evaluating its application prior to surgery, and considerable variability exists in treatment protocols. No standardized clinical protocol exists, which hinders result comparisons. Although prehabilitation shows promising potential, current studies present heterogeneous results. Clinical trials are needed to standardize interventions, expand sample sizes, and conduct long-term follow-ups to consolidate evidence and improve patient care. PROSPERO REGISTER: Prospero Register: CRD42024619694.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative ExerciseProstatectomyUrinary IncontinenceHumansMalePelvic FloorProstatic NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomePelvic floorPelvic floor exercisesPrehabilitationRadical prostatectomyUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID40898154
PMCPMC12403351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.