Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40898145›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

The positive impact of students in general practice clerkships in rural Germany: diverging views of students, general practitioners, and practice assistants in a prospective survey.

Wolfgang Blank, Anna Sporkert, Lars Daenenfaust, Sabine Gehrke-Beck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wolfgang BlankGeneral Practice "Im Bayerwald", Am Alten Sportplatz 3, 94259, Kirchberg im Wald, Germany.
Anna SporkertGeneral Practice "Im Bayerwald", Am Alten Sportplatz 3, 94259, Kirchberg im Wald, Germany.
Lars DaenenfaustInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University Hospital Cologne, Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Köln, Germany.
Sabine Gehrke-BeckInstitute for General Practice, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. sabine.gehrke-beck@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruiting and retention of teaching practices is challenging. Although GP teaching physicians are predominantly intrinsically motivated, the time required for teaching is often cited as a barrier. Practice teams could benefit, if the students' learning in practice is optimized in such a way that there is also a noticeable positive impact in daily work. To inform this, we explored students', general practitioners' (GPs) and practice assistants' (PAs) views on the positive impact that students could have during a general practice clerkship (GPC). We asked participants and teaching practices of the "Excellent Summer", a GPC project in rural Bavaria.

methodsBased on a qualitative survey, we developed a questionnaire with 12 items rating the potential benefits of students in practice. Students, GPs and PAs gave their subjective assessment of the benefits on a 4-point Likert scale. The students completed the questionnaire before and after their clinical traineeship. The assessments of the three groups were compared using variance analysis, the pre-post assessment among students using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

results44 students, 59 GPs and 29 PAs (100% response rate) responded. Initially, the students rated their support in routine tasks and their influence on cultural attitudes higher than GPS and PAs. GPs and PAs rated students´contribution through up-to-date knowledge and the stimulation of self-reflection higher than students themselves. They similarly saw enjoyment with teaching and sharing experiences as bigger than students. MFAs perceived the influence of students in a similar way to the GPs, but saw the benefit of students for patient care more positively. During the clinical traineeship, the students' assessment approached that of the practice team in some aspects.

conclusionsDiffering expectations can be addressed with customized preparation and instructions for students and practice teams and optimize benefits of students´ activities. Positive impact of students´ clerkships can facilitate recruiting and retainment of teaching practices.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersPhysician AssistantsStudents, MedicalAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleGermanyHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRural Health ServicesClinical clerkshipGeneral practiceHealth care teamMedical educationMotivation

Identifiers

PMID40898145
PMCPMC12403355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.